This is part of a series of posts about the 'little of visualisation design', respecting the small decisions that make a big difference towards the good and bad of this discipline. In each post I'm going to focus on just one small matter - a singular good or bad design choice - as demonstrated by a sample project. Each project may have many effective and ineffective aspects, but I'm just commenting on one. - Andy Kirk
Better Colour Keys
The 'little' of this design concerns a clever approach to squeezing more potential out of your colour keys, as demonstrated by the project 'Rethinking Detroit' by the National Geographic, looking at the changing fortunes of Detroit's neighbourhoods block-by-block.
-png.png?sfvrsn=c9505dab_2)
Distinct colouring
The 'little' of this design concerns the confusion that arises through careless colour choices. The specific subjects here relate to a pair of example charts used on TV during recent Wimbledon (BBC) and Cricket (Sky) coverage in the UK.
Imposed colours
The next and final ‘little’ in this week’s post concerns the use of colour and specifically the restrictions caused by the universal application of 'corporate' colour palettes. There are benefits from applying consistent colours to facilitate brand recognition but sometimes this can cause unnecessary obstruction.
Check out the next post on labelling conventions!
